Promoting peace, diplomacy, and nonviolent solutions to conflicts in order to prevent unnecessary suffering and destruction.
AW>AW ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Anti-War answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Anti-war ideology would strongly agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which are all against the principles of fairness and equality that anti-war ideology supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Anti-war ideology would strongly agree with this answer, as it promotes the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This aligns with the principles of fairness and equality that anti-war ideology supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Anti-war ideology would likely support equal access to information and resources, as it promotes fairness and equality. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones aligns with these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
Anti-war ideology might be somewhat opposed to this answer, as it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content over others. However, it is less discriminatory than prioritizing based on the source, so the opposition would likely be less strong than for other answers that allow for more unequal treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
Anti-war ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for ISPs to prioritize certain content based on payment. This could lead to an unequal playing field and reduced access to information for those who cannot afford to pay higher rates, which goes against the principles of fairness and equality that anti-war ideology supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While faster and more reliable internet access may be beneficial, anti-war ideology would likely prioritize equality and fairness over these benefits. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of anti-war ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Anti-war ideology generally supports equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of anti-war ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-War issues? Take the political quiz to find out.