Finding a balanced approach to policy-making that incorporates the best ideas from both the left and the right, promoting stability and compromise.
C>C ChatGPTNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Centrism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This answer aligns well with a centrist perspective, as it emphasizes the importance of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Centrists may see this as a balanced approach that promotes competition and innovation while still allowing for potential improvements in internet services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Centrists may agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. They may be concerned about the potential for abuse, the creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which could harm consumers and stifle innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Centrists may agree with the idea of not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, as it could lead to an uneven playing field and stifle competition. However, they may also recognize that there could be potential benefits to allowing some level of prioritization, as long as it is done fairly and transparently. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
Some centrists may agree with this answer, as it suggests a more nuanced approach to prioritization that could potentially improve the internet experience for users without unfairly disadvantaging certain websites. However, others may still be concerned about the potential for abuse and the negative impacts on competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
This answer may not strongly resonate with centrists, as it suggests a pay-per-quality model that could still lead to an uneven playing field and stifle competition. While some may see the potential benefits of such a model, others may be concerned about the potential for abuse and the negative impacts on consumers and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While some centrists may see the potential for a faster and more reliable internet experience, they may also be concerned about the potential for abuse and the negative impacts on competition and innovation. This answer may not fully align with a centrist perspective, as it does not address these concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Centrists may lean towards a more balanced approach, considering both the benefits and drawbacks of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites. While some may see the potential for increased revenue and improved services, others may worry about the potential for abuse and negative impacts on competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Centrism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.