@ISIDEWITHQuestionsForeign policyStarted 3mos agoActive 1 day ago

Do you support the government calling for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza?

The Israel-Hamas war is an armed conflict between Israel and Hamas militant groups that has been taking place in and around the Gaza strip since October 7 2023. The conflict started when Hamas militant groups fired rockets and attacked communities and military bases in southern Israel. 1,139 people were killed in the attack including 766 civilians and 373 civilian forces. 250 Israelis were taken hostage by Hamas. On October 27th the Israeli Army launched a large-scale ground incursion into the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and Gaza strip. On October 24th 2023 the United Nations…  

Read more
65%
Yes
35%
No
65%
Yes
35%
No

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Gaza ceasefire” has changed over time for 2.5k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Gaza ceasefire” has changed over time for 2.5k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9KDFWF6 from Texas answered…2mos2MO

Until security is put in place to stop terrorist attacks from occurring by the hamas rulers, then no.

 @9M699Z3 from New York answered…1 day1D

Prevent the monoethnic ideologies being implemented in Israel against Palestine, but also take measures to eradicate Hamas and protect both Israeli and Palestinian citizens. Remove Israeli troops and insert American troops?

 @9M3KVCG from Florida answered…4 days4D

No... Gaza has been terrorizing Israel for to long. Israel needs to put an end to the problem once and for all. Gaza is governed by terrorists. You can't trust terrorists.

 @9M2BQY6 from Utah answered…5 days5D

I think that there should be a ceasefire, but there are steps that need to be taken to where they aren't retaliated against.

 @9LL66PN from Georgia answered…3wks3W

well it depends because of course i would want to stop the fight but if it is going to affect the U.S then i would disagree.

 @9CNWMJT  from Texas answered…3mos3MO

I support the idea that diplomatic talks should happen to end the conflict, although the attacks by Hamas were started during a previous ceasefire. I don't think a permanent ceasefire will happen unless either Israel or Hamas wipes out the other.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Gaza ceasefire” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

High-Stakes Diplomacy in Cairo: CIA Director Engages in Gaza Ceasefire Talks

In a significant move underscoring the urgency of the situation in Gaza, CIA Director William Burns has arrived in Cairo for a series of critical meetings aimed at negotiating a ceasefire and securing a hostage release. This development comes amidst a backdrop of escalating tensions and violence, highlighting the international community's concerted efforts to restore peace in the region. Burns' presence in Cairo marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing negotiations, with expectations running high for a breakthrough that could pave the way for a lasting resolution to the conflict.The arrival of a Hamas delegation in Cairo, scheduled for Saturday, further intensifies the diplomatic activity in the Egyptian capital. This delegation is expected to deliver a written response to an Israeli proposal, a step that could potentially move the parties closer to an agreement. The involvement of high-level figures such as the CIA Director in these discussions signals the complexity and significance of the negotiations, underscoring the global stakes involved in achieving peace in Gaza.The talks in Cairo are not just about brokering a ceasefire; they are also deeply concerned with the humanitarian aspect, particularly the release of hostages. The international community watches closely, hoping that the negotiations will lead to a significant de-escalation of the conflict and provide a pathway to a more stable and peaceful future for the region.The role of Egypt as a mediator in these talks is crucial. Historically, Egypt has played a key role in facilitating dialogue between Israel and Palestinian factions, and its involvement in the current negotiations is a testament to its ongoing commitment to regional stability. The meetings in Cairo, therefore, are not just bilateral or limited to the immediate parties involved but carry a broader significance for Middle East peace efforts.As the world awaits the outcome of these high-stakes negotiations, the presence of international figures like CIA Director Burns in Cairo serves as a reminder of the complex interplay of diplomacy, security, and humanitarian concerns that define the Gaza conflict. The coming days are critical, with the potential to either escalate the situation further or, hopefully, mark the beginning of a peaceful resolution.

▲  98 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1wk1W

Blinken's Strategic Mission to Saudi Arabia Aims to Broker Gaza Ceasefire

In a pivotal move aimed at quelling the escalating tensions in the Middle East, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is set to travel to Saudi Arabia next week. This high-stakes visit underscores the Biden administration's commitment to fostering peace and stability in the region, particularly against the backdrop of the stalled negotiations between Israel and Hamas. Blinken's agenda is heavily focused on brokering a ceasefire in Gaza, a task that has eluded international diplomats amid rising violence and humanitarian concerns.During his two-day visit, Blinken will engage with regional partners, demonstrating the United States' proactive stance in seeking a diplomatic resolution to the conflict. The discussions are expected to revolve around achieving a ceasefire that not only halts the current hostilities but also addresses the underlying issues, including the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. The complexity of the situation requires a nuanced approach, balancing the immediate need for peace with long-term security and stability in the region.Blinken's trip to Saudi Arabia is a testament to the kingdom's influential role in Middle Eastern politics and its potential to act as a mediator in the conflict. The visit also reflects a broader strategy to strengthen alliances and foster cooperation among nations that share a common interest in ending the cycle of violence between Israel and Hamas. By rallying support from key regional players, the U.S. aims to create a unified front that can exert meaningful pressure on both parties to come to the negotiating table.The international community watches closely as Blinken's mission carries the weight of immense expectations. Success in Saudi Arabia could pave the way for a breakthrough in the peace process, offering a glimmer of hope to a region long tormented by conflict. However, the challenges ahead are formidable, with deep-seated mistrust and unresolved grievances complicating the path to reconciliation.As Blinken prepares for his critical journey, the stakes could not be higher. The outcome of his efforts in Saudi Arabia may well determine the future trajectory of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, highlighting the importance of diplomacy in resolving one of the world's most intractable disputes. The world awaits the results of this diplomatic endeavor, hoping for a step towards lasting peace in the Middle East.

▲  1211 replies

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to America voters.

 @ISIDEWITH asked…1mo1MO

Do you believe that strategic political endorsements are fair play, or do they undermine the integrity of the electoral…

In a series of developments that have stirred the political landscape, former President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed the presidential bid of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., describing it as 'great for MAGA.' Trump's remarks came after Kennedy announced his vice-presidential pick, further intensifying the political discourse. Trump, in his characteristic style, took to social media to express his views, labeling Kennedy as the 'most radical left' candidate in the race and highlighting the liberal credentials of Kennedy's running mate, Nicole Shanahan. Despite his criticism of their political stance, Trump views Kennedy's candidacy as beneficial for his MAGA movement, suggesting it could potentially divide the Democratic vote.Kennedy, a figure who has long been associated with controversial views, particularly on the rule of law and established science, has drawn criticism and concern from various quarters. His decision to run for president and the subsequent endorsement by Trump has sparked a flurry of reactions, with some seeing it as a strategic move that could impact the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming elections. Allies of President Joe Biden have expressed alarm over Kennedy's bid, fearing it could siphon off crucial votes from the left, thereby posing a significant threat to Biden's reelection efforts.The political dynamics surrounding Kennedy's candidacy and Trump's endorsement underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of American politics. As the race for the presidency heats up, the strategies employed by candidates and their supporters are coming under increased scrutiny. The potential impact of Kennedy's run on the Democratic vote is a topic of much speculation, with analysts and political observers closely monitoring the situation.Trump's support for Kennedy, despite their ideological differences, highlights the former president's tactical approach to politics. By endorsing a candidate who could potentially weaken his opponents, Trump is playing a strategic game, aiming to maximize his own chances of success. This move has not only added a new dimension to the political landscape but has also raised questions about the future direction of both the Republican and Democratic parties.As the United States gears up for another presidential election, the emergence of candidates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the reactions they provoke from figures like Donald Trump are indicative of the shifting sands of American politics. With the electorate increasingly polarized, the outcome of the election remains uncertain, and the strategies adopted by candidates will be crucial in determining the path forward.

▲  31 reply